四、两种协作模式
4. Two patterns of collaboration
PCT申请大部分在集群内部完成。按唯一计数,五年间该集群有446件PCT申请由多名发明人共同完成,其中57件有集群外发明人参与,约占全部申请的10%。主要合作地为深圳–香港–广州、上海–苏州和北京。
Most PCT applications take place within the cluster. On a unique-count basis, over the five years, 446 of the cluster's PCT applications had multiple inventors, and 57 of these involved inventors outside the cluster, about 10% of all applications. The main collaborating locations are Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou, Shanghai–Suzhou and Beijing.
科研活动则深度融入外部网络。按唯一计数,在50,889篇多作者科学出版物中,有36,343篇与集群外机构合作完成,约占全部科学出版物的71%。主要合作地为北京、深圳–香港–广州和上海–苏州。
Research, by contrast, is deeply embedded in external networks. On a unique-count basis, of 50,889 multi-author scientific publications, 36,343 were produced with organizations outside the cluster, about 71% of all scientific publications. The main collaborating locations are Beijing, Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou and Shanghai–Suzhou.
五、规模与强度
5. Size and intensity
按总量计,福州位列全球第96位;按创新强度(即相对人口规模的创新产出)计,它位列第81位。
By total output, Fuzhou ranks 96th in the world; by innovation intensity, meaning innovation output relative to population, it ranks 81st.
换算到人口,该集群每百万居民对应148件PCT申请、7,861篇科学出版物和40笔风险投资交易。其强度排名高于总量排名。
Per million inhabitants, the cluster records 148 PCT applications, 7,861 scientific publications and 40 venture capital deals. Its ranking by intensity is higher than its ranking by size.