四、两种协作模式
4. Two patterns of collaboration
PCT申请大部分在集群内部完成。按唯一计数,五年间该集群有613件PCT申请由多名发明人共同完成,其中122件有集群外发明人参与,约占全部申请的16%。主要合作地为上海–苏州、北京和温州。
Most PCT applications take place within the cluster. On a unique-count basis, over the five years, 613 of the cluster's PCT applications had multiple inventors, and 122 of these involved inventors outside the cluster, about 16% of all applications. The main collaborating locations are Shanghai–Suzhou, Beijing and Wenzhou.
科研活动则深度融入外部网络。按唯一计数,在74,582篇多作者科学出版物中,有53,055篇与集群外机构合作完成,约占全部科学出版物的70%。主要合作地为北京、深圳–香港–广州和上海–苏州。
Research, by contrast, is deeply embedded in external networks. On a unique-count basis, of 74,582 multi-author scientific publications, 53,055 were produced with organizations outside the cluster, about 70% of all scientific publications. The main collaborating locations are Beijing, Shenzhen–Hong Kong–Guangzhou and Shanghai–Suzhou.
五、规模与强度
5. Size and intensity
按总量计,郑州位列全球第73位;按创新强度(即相对人口规模的创新产出)计,它位列第86位。
By total output, Zhengzhou ranks 73rd in the world; by innovation intensity, meaning innovation output relative to population, it ranks 86th.
换算到人口,该集群每百万居民对应122件PCT申请、7,464篇科学出版物和27笔风险投资交易。其总量排名高于强度排名。
Per million inhabitants, the cluster records 122 PCT applications, 7,464 scientific publications and 27 venture capital deals. Its ranking by size is higher than its ranking by intensity.